Quick update for the week. So I went up to the northern part of Michigan with Laura for vacation. We drove up to the top of the Leelenau Peninsula and checked out a lighthouse there. We hiked the Sleeping Bear Sand Dunes. We got cherry pie from Crystal Lake. We tried to avoid angry Christians yelling about Hell in downtown Traverse City. We played mini golf. Had a picnic on Lake Michigan and it was like 100 degrees.
Took my car to the shop this week and between that and Traverse City and Lansing and providing for the two of us for the last two months that Laura hasn't been working - I'm in the red now. I confessed as much to a former postdoc of my lab who's here from Argentina for a month and he said, "Why don't you just go into debt then?" I'm like, "Huh?" and he says, "Sure, all my friends do it. They drink fine wine and buy nice cars and go into debt, what's the big deal?" I'm like, "No thanks."
Today, Laura and I had lunch with a rotating student in our lab and then we saw a Hindi movie.
Laura was reading this
paper yesterday by this Rabbi Gottlieb guy who got his PhD in mathematical logic. Basically his paper is an attempt to logically explain why everybody should be a Jew. I decided I'm man enough that I can challenge my lack of faith, so I read it. He makes some good points, but it definitely doesn't add up for me. On certain points such as the uniqueness of the Jewish survival for the past 3 millenia, he challenges the reader to come up with a naturalistic explanation. He builds some strawman arguments and knocks them down and then declares that there is no such explanation and that the only explanation is G-d.
Even more ridiculous is his argument that the revelation of the Torah at Mt. Sinai really happened. Does this argument involve archaeological evidence? No! He basically says, to paraphrase, "1) A lot of people believe this, 2) This was an event that was witnessed by an entire nation, 3) There is no way a rumor of such of an event could evolve into a belief held by millions of Jews (and billions of Xians and Muslims) if it didn't actually happened. Ergo, it happened. He distinguishes this kind of event from other miracle stories such as Mohammed talking to G-d or, Jesus walking on water, since that was witnessed respectively, by only one person and a very few people. Whereas the revelation at Sinai was witnessed by an entire nation.
So what? I can come up with a plausible scenario as to how such an event can become accepted even if it didn't happen. Let's say 100 years after Sinai supposedly happened, the Jews are living in Israel. And the government they're living under controls all the media and effectively runs a police state. The government declares orally and in writing that this event happened. Further, they arrest and kill those who are skeptical of this story. The remainder of the people will come to either: 1) Believe it, or 2) Not believe it, but keep that to themselves. So this story gets handed down from parents to kids and over time people forget about that police state, but remember the story. That's more plausible to me then the story actually being true. He even admits that a lot of Chinese people believe that what happened at Tianemen Square is that the students fired first and the police responded. Most Chinese don't have access to media outside of the control of the government, so they take this as fact. Is it so hard to believe that the same thing didn't occur in Ancient Israel?
I guess the point I want to make is that you can't prove religion. It's based on a gut feeling. Not believing in G-d is based on a gut feeling too. This guy is trying to pretend he's a scientist and apply the scientific method to his faith and he fails miserably.